ALMOND BARK vs SCM DESIGNS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SCM DESIGNS wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
ALMOND BARK: 1
vs
SCM DESIGNS: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALMOND BARK | SCM DESIGNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 350 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 5 g | |
| Carbs | 70 g | 83.3 g | |
| Fat | 30 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALMOND BARK | SCM DESIGNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALMOND BARK | SCM DESIGNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |