ALMOND BARK vs 60% CACAO BITTERSWEET CHOCOLATE PREMIUM BAKING CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
60% CACAO BITTERSWEET CHOCOLATE PREMIUM BAKING CHIPS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
ALMOND BARK: 2
vs
60% CACAO BITTERSWEET CHOCOLATE PREMIUM BAKING CHIPS: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALMOND BARK | 60% CACAO BITTERSWEET CHOCOLATE PREMIUM BAKING CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 533 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 73.3 g | 53.3 g | |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALMOND BARK | 60% CACAO BITTERSWEET CHOCOLATE PREMIUM BAKING CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALMOND BARK | 60% CACAO BITTERSWEET CHOCOLATE PREMIUM BAKING CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 7.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |