ALL MALT AMBER-LAGER WORCESTERSHIRE vs STONE GROUND MUSTARD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALL MALT AMBER-LAGER WORCESTERSHIRE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
ALL MALT AMBER-LAGER WORCESTERSHIRE: 4
vs
STONE GROUND MUSTARD: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALL MALT AMBER-LAGER WORCESTERSHIRE | STONE GROUND MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 117 cal | 200 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 26.7 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALL MALT AMBER-LAGER WORCESTERSHIRE | STONE GROUND MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALL MALT AMBER-LAGER WORCESTERSHIRE | STONE GROUND MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,033 MG | 600 MG |