ALBACORE READY-TO-EAT TUNA SALAD vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN OF THE SEA wins in 7 out of 15 nutrient categories
ALBACORE READY-TO-EAT TUNA SALAD: 5
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALBACORE READY-TO-EAT TUNA SALAD | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 125 cal | |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 26.8 g | |
| Carbs | 4.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALBACORE READY-TO-EAT TUNA SALAD | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 10.7 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 1.1 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALBACORE READY-TO-EAT TUNA SALAD | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 224 MG | 134 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 0 UG | 112 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 365 MG | 62 MG |