ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON: 5
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 29 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 224 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 9.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 322 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 353 MG | 357 MG |