ALASKA SKINLESS vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 12 nutrient categories
ALASKA SKINLESS: 2
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALASKA SKINLESS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 54 cal | |
| Protein | 16.8 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALASKA SKINLESS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALASKA SKINLESS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 327 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 159 MG | 741 MG |