AHOLD vs BACK TO NATURE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACK TO NATURE wins in 8 out of 14 nutrient categories
AHOLD: 4
vs
BACK TO NATURE: 8
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | AHOLD | BACK TO NATURE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 558 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 9.3 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 39.5 g | 53.3 g | |
| Fat | 39.5 g | 26.7 g | |
| Fiber | 7 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | AHOLD | BACK TO NATURE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | AHOLD | BACK TO NATURE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 93 MG | 133 MG | |
| Copper, Cu | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.2 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 0 MG | 133 MG | |
| Manganese, Mn | 0 MG | 1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 533 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 35 MG | 0 MG |