AHOLD vs KETTLE COOKED CRINKLE POTATO CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KETTLE COOKED CRINKLE POTATO CHIPS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
AHOLD: 4
vs
KETTLE COOKED CRINKLE POTATO CHIPS: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | AHOLD | KETTLE COOKED CRINKLE POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 73.3 g | 64.3 g | |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | AHOLD | KETTLE COOKED CRINKLE POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 32.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | AHOLD | KETTLE COOKED CRINKLE POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 143 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 417 MG | 786 MG |