AGED WHITE CHEDDAR BAKED PUFFS vs MI COSTENITA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
AGED WHITE CHEDDAR BAKED PUFFS: 3
vs
MI COSTENITA: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | AGED WHITE CHEDDAR BAKED PUFFS | MI COSTENITA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 50 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 32.1 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | AGED WHITE CHEDDAR BAKED PUFFS | MI COSTENITA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 607 MG | 2,429 MG |