91/110 CPD T/OFF SHRIMP vs 50/60 IQF PINK SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
91/110 CPD T/OFF SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
91/110 CPD T/OFF SHRIMP: 5
vs
50/60 IQF PINK SHRIMP: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 91/110 CPD T/OFF SHRIMP | 50/60 IQF PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 60 cal | 80 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 91/110 CPD T/OFF SHRIMP | 50/60 IQF PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.4 MG | 1.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | 91/110 CPD T/OFF SHRIMP | 50/60 IQF PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 55 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 54 MG | 80 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 714 MG | 170 MG |