41/50 IQF S/ON SHRIMP vs 16/20 OZ CAN LOBSTER TAIL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
16/20 OZ CAN LOBSTER TAIL wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
41/50 IQF S/ON SHRIMP: 2
vs
16/20 OZ CAN LOBSTER TAIL: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 41/50 IQF S/ON SHRIMP | 16/20 OZ CAN LOBSTER TAIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 82 cal | 80 cal | |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 41/50 IQF S/ON SHRIMP | 16/20 OZ CAN LOBSTER TAIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | 41/50 IQF S/ON SHRIMP | 16/20 OZ CAN LOBSTER TAIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 41 MG | 84 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 147 MG | 200 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 565 MG | 429 MG |