31/35 S/ON WHITE SHRIMP vs 50/60 IQF PUD SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
31/35 S/ON WHITE SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
31/35 S/ON WHITE SHRIMP: 5
vs
50/60 IQF PUD SHRIMP: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 31/35 S/ON WHITE SHRIMP | 50/60 IQF PUD SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 20.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 31/35 S/ON WHITE SHRIMP | 50/60 IQF PUD SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | 31/35 S/ON WHITE SHRIMP | 50/60 IQF PUD SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 23 MG | 70 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 252 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 168 MG | 143 MG |