25% LESS SODIUM MONTREAL CHICKEN SEASONING vs CERULEAN SEAS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 12 nutrient categories
25% LESS SODIUM MONTREAL CHICKEN SEASONING: 3
vs
CERULEAN SEAS: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 25% LESS SODIUM MONTREAL CHICKEN SEASONING | CERULEAN SEAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 345 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 10.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 72.4 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 25% LESS SODIUM MONTREAL CHICKEN SEASONING | CERULEAN SEAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | 25% LESS SODIUM MONTREAL CHICKEN SEASONING | CERULEAN SEAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 6,429 MG | 2,034 MG |