16/20 S/ON TIGER SHRIMP vs 14/16 OZ LOBSTER TAILS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
16/20 S/ON TIGER SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
16/20 S/ON TIGER SHRIMP: 5
vs
14/16 OZ LOBSTER TAILS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 16/20 S/ON TIGER SHRIMP | 14/16 OZ LOBSTER TAILS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 62 cal | 116 cal | |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 20.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 16/20 S/ON TIGER SHRIMP | 14/16 OZ LOBSTER TAILS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | 16/20 S/ON TIGER SHRIMP | 14/16 OZ LOBSTER TAILS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 75 MG | 49 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 80 MG | 180 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 743 MG | 179 MG |