100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF BONE-IN SHORT RIBS vs REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF BONE-IN SHORT RIBS: 2
vs
REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF BONE-IN SHORT RIBS | REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 295 cal | 241 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 18.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 25.9 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF BONE-IN SHORT RIBS | REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF BONE-IN SHORT RIBS | REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 214 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 58 MG | 179 MG |