SOLID WHITE ALBACORE TUNA vs WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER LOBSTER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER LOBSTER wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SOLID WHITE ALBACORE TUNA: 2
vs
WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER LOBSTER: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOLID WHITE ALBACORE TUNA | WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER LOBSTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 94 cal | |
| Protein | 24.7 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 1.2 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.6 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOLID WHITE ALBACORE TUNA | WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER LOBSTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOLID WHITE ALBACORE TUNA | WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER LOBSTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 72 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 358 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 318 MG | 376 MG |