JOHN MORRELL vs MAPLE THICK CUT BACON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MAPLE THICK CUT BACON wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
JOHN MORRELL: 2
vs
MAPLE THICK CUT BACON: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | JOHN MORRELL | MAPLE THICK CUT BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 588 cal | 538 cal | |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 30.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 52.9 g | 38.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | JOHN MORRELL | MAPLE THICK CUT BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | JOHN MORRELL | MAPLE THICK CUT BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,765 MG | 1,462 MG |