CLASSIC BONELESS HAM STEAKS vs PORK BACK RIBS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC BONELESS HAM STEAKS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CLASSIC BONELESS HAM STEAKS: 6
vs
PORK BACK RIBS: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC BONELESS HAM STEAKS | PORK BACK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 236 cal | |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 16.4 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 13.6 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 12.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC BONELESS HAM STEAKS | PORK BACK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC BONELESS HAM STEAKS | PORK BACK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 4.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 690 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 833 MG | 400 MG |