CHOPPED CLAMS vs WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHOPPED CLAMS: 3
vs
WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOPPED CLAMS | WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 45 cal | 151 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 20.8 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 7.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOPPED CLAMS | WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOPPED CLAMS | WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 425 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 340 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 625 MG | 340 MG |