BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM vs CLASSIC BONELESS HAM STEAKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM: 5
vs
CLASSIC BONELESS HAM STEAKS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM | CLASSIC BONELESS HAM STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 16.7 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM | CLASSIC BONELESS HAM STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 10.7 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM | CLASSIC BONELESS HAM STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 690 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,393 MG | 833 MG |