ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK vs CRISPY BATTERED COD FISH FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK: 7
vs
CRISPY BATTERED COD FISH FILLETS: 1
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK | CRISPY BATTERED COD FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 157 cal | 170 cal | |
| Protein | 17.1 g | 11.6 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 9.8 g | |
| Fat | 6.4 g | 8.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK | CRISPY BATTERED COD FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALMOND CRUSTED HADDOCK | CRISPY BATTERED COD FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 29 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 286 MG | 509 MG |