WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON vs SCALLOPS WRAPPED IN BACON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON: 7
vs
SCALLOPS WRAPPED IN BACON: 1
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | SCALLOPS WRAPPED IN BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 209 cal | |
| Protein | 19.1 g | 17.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.1 g | |
| Fat | 7.9 g | 15.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | SCALLOPS WRAPPED IN BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | SCALLOPS WRAPPED IN BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 143 MG | 44 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.9 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 485 MG |