WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET vs BEER BATTERED TAIL ON SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET: 6
vs
BEER BATTERED TAIL ON SHRIMP: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | BEER BATTERED TAIL ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 86 cal | 271 cal | |
| Protein | 19.2 g | 8.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 31.8 g | |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 11.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | BEER BATTERED TAIL ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | BEER BATTERED TAIL ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 65 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 132 MG | 671 MG |