WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET vs BATTER DIPPED FISH FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET: 5
vs
BATTER DIPPED FISH FILLETS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | BATTER DIPPED FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 86 cal | 284 cal | |
| Protein | 19.2 g | 10.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 23.0 g | |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 16.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | BATTER DIPPED FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | BATTER DIPPED FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 27 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 132 MG | 446 MG |