WHOLE ALMONDS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHOLE ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WHOLE ALMONDS: 5
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHOLE ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 583 cal | 533 cal | |
| Protein | 19.4 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 19.4 g | 56.7 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 30 g | |
| Fiber | 11.1 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHOLE ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHOLE ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 222 MG | 100 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 67 MG |