WHITE COOKING WINE vs CHICKEN MARSALA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN MARSALA wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WHITE COOKING WINE: 3
vs
CHICKEN MARSALA: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE COOKING WINE | CHICKEN MARSALA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 67 cal | 117 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE COOKING WINE | CHICKEN MARSALA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 20 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 67 MG | 203 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 633 MG | 833 MG |