WAFFLE CONES vs ZWIEBACK - RUSK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ZWIEBACK - RUSK wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
WAFFLE CONES: 4
vs
ZWIEBACK - RUSK: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WAFFLE CONES | ZWIEBACK - RUSK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 368 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 10.5 g | |
| Carbs | 90 g | 79.0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 5.3 g | |
| Fiber | 5 g | 5.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WAFFLE CONES | ZWIEBACK - RUSK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WAFFLE CONES | ZWIEBACK - RUSK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 100 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.5 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 150 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 175 MG | 289 MG |