VIRGINIA BRAND HAM vs SUGARDALE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SUGARDALE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
VIRGINIA BRAND HAM: 2
vs
SUGARDALE: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | VIRGINIA BRAND HAM | SUGARDALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | VIRGINIA BRAND HAM | SUGARDALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | VIRGINIA BRAND HAM | SUGARDALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 982 MG | 1,533 MG |