TUSCAN BEAN & KALE vs KUNG PAO CHICKEN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TUSCAN BEAN & KALE wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
TUSCAN BEAN & KALE: 6
vs
KUNG PAO CHICKEN: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUSCAN BEAN & KALE | KUNG PAO CHICKEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 102 cal | 112 cal | |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 5 g | |
| Carbs | 18.4 g | 16.5 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 2.9 g | |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUSCAN BEAN & KALE | KUNG PAO CHICKEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUSCAN BEAN & KALE | KUNG PAO CHICKEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.0 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 117 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 173 MG | 291 MG |