TUNA vs WILD CAUGHT PACIFIC WHITING FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT PACIFIC WHITING FILLETS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
TUNA: 4
vs
WILD CAUGHT PACIFIC WHITING FILLETS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUNA | WILD CAUGHT PACIFIC WHITING FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 94 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 5.7 g | 18.8 g | |
| Carbs | 10.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUNA | WILD CAUGHT PACIFIC WHITING FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 5.7 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUNA | WILD CAUGHT PACIFIC WHITING FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 38 MG | 45 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 250 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 443 MG | 170 MG |