TIPO COCKTAIL CAMARON CHICO vs CHUB MACKEREL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 15 nutrient categories
TIPO COCKTAIL CAMARON CHICO: 6
vs
CHUB MACKEREL: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TIPO COCKTAIL CAMARON CHICO | CHUB MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 23.2 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 8.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TIPO COCKTAIL CAMARON CHICO | CHUB MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 7.1 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 7.5 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TIPO COCKTAIL CAMARON CHICO | CHUB MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 268 MG | 179 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 232 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 0 UG | 56 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 357 MG | 393 MG |