THINLY SLICED BLACK FOREST HAM vs ANGUS CORNED SLICED BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
THINLY SLICED BLACK FOREST HAM wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
THINLY SLICED BLACK FOREST HAM: 5
vs
ANGUS CORNED SLICED BEEF: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | THINLY SLICED BLACK FOREST HAM | ANGUS CORNED SLICED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 17.9 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | THINLY SLICED BLACK FOREST HAM | ANGUS CORNED SLICED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 6.4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | THINLY SLICED BLACK FOREST HAM | ANGUS CORNED SLICED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 1,125 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 839 MG | 821 MG |