SUSTENANCE SNACK vs SWEET CHIPOTLE PORK RINDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET CHIPOTLE PORK RINDS wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
SUSTENANCE SNACK: 3
vs
SWEET CHIPOTLE PORK RINDS: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SUSTENANCE SNACK | SWEET CHIPOTLE PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 571 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 50 g | |
| Carbs | 25 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SUSTENANCE SNACK | SWEET CHIPOTLE PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 8 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SUSTENANCE SNACK | SWEET CHIPOTLE PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 482 MG | 964 MG |