SOLID WILD TUNA STEAK vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOLID WILD TUNA STEAK wins in 5 out of 14 nutrient categories
SOLID WILD TUNA STEAK: 5
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 1
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOLID WILD TUNA STEAK | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 125 cal | 125 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 30.4 g | 28.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.9 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOLID WILD TUNA STEAK | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 28.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 2.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOLID WILD TUNA STEAK | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.6 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 375 MG | 179 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 138 UG | 0 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 304 MG | 321 MG |