SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM vs CHICKEN BOLOGNA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM: 6
vs
CHICKEN BOLOGNA: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 109 cal | 235 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 8.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 8.8 g | |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 14.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | CHICKEN BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 351 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 1,235 MG |