SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD MACKEREL vs CANDIED SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD MACKEREL: 4
vs
CANDIED SALMON: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD MACKEREL | CANDIED SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 388 cal | 474 cal | |
| Protein | 17.5 g | 21.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 28.1 g | |
| Fat | 35 g | 29.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD MACKEREL | CANDIED SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD MACKEREL | CANDIED SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 235 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 438 MG | 789 MG |