SCHALLER & WEBER vs BNLS BEEF BOTTOM ROUND STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BNLS BEEF BOTTOM ROUND STEAK wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SCHALLER & WEBER: 3
vs
BNLS BEEF BOTTOM ROUND STEAK: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SCHALLER & WEBER | BNLS BEEF BOTTOM ROUND STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 339 cal | 196 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 20.5 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 30.4 g | 11.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SCHALLER & WEBER | BNLS BEEF BOTTOM ROUND STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SCHALLER & WEBER | BNLS BEEF BOTTOM ROUND STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.2 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 411 MG | 58 MG |