RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS vs OATNUT SMALL SLICE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS: 4
vs
OATNUT SMALL SLICE: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS | OATNUT SMALL SLICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 281 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 7.0 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 54.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 5.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS | OATNUT SMALL SLICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS | OATNUT SMALL SLICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 298 MG | 0 MG |