RIVER QUEEN vs LOW SODIUM ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LOW SODIUM ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
RIVER QUEEN: 3
vs
LOW SODIUM ALMONDS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RIVER QUEEN | LOW SODIUM ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 607 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 21.4 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 46.4 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 10.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RIVER QUEEN | LOW SODIUM ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RIVER QUEEN | LOW SODIUM ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 286 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 679 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 321 MG | 179 MG |