REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS vs KIELBASA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS: 6
vs
KIELBASA: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | KIELBASA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 208 cal | 295 cal | |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 15.4 g | |
| Carbs | 6.3 g | 5.1 g | |
| Fat | 14.6 g | 21.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | KIELBASA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 37.5 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | KIELBASA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 51 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 359 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 979 MG | 910 MG |