RED SILK BEANS vs PACIFIC WAKAME
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PACIFIC WAKAME wins in 7 out of 14 nutrient categories
RED SILK BEANS: 4
vs
PACIFIC WAKAME: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED SILK BEANS | PACIFIC WAKAME | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 139 cal | 200 cal | |
| Protein | 22.2 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 63.9 g | 40 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 44.4 g | 20 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RED SILK BEANS | PACIFIC WAKAME | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 1 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED SILK BEANS | PACIFIC WAKAME | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 167 MG | 800 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 7.5 MG | 7.2 MG | |
| Phosphorus, P | 0 MG | 400 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 5,500 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 69 MG | 6,000 MG |