RANCH vs TUSCAN STYLE WHITE BEAN HUMMUS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TUSCAN STYLE WHITE BEAN HUMMUS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
RANCH: 2
vs
TUSCAN STYLE WHITE BEAN HUMMUS: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH | TUSCAN STYLE WHITE BEAN HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 161 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fat | 32.1 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH | TUSCAN STYLE WHITE BEAN HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH | TUSCAN STYLE WHITE BEAN HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 286 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 571 MG | 411 MG |