PORK TENDERLOIN vs GROUND BEEF CHUCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GROUND BEEF CHUCK wins in 8 out of 15 nutrient categories
PORK TENDERLOIN: 5
vs
GROUND BEEF CHUCK: 8
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PORK TENDERLOIN | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 98 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 19.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PORK TENDERLOIN | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 4.5 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 2.1 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PORK TENDERLOIN | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 0 UG | 16 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 304 MG | 67 MG | |
| Zinc, Zn | 0 MG | 4.0 MG |