PLANT-BASED GROUND vs BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PLANT-BASED GROUND wins in 9 out of 15 nutrient categories
PLANT-BASED GROUND: 9
vs
BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PLANT-BASED GROUND | BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 239 cal | 183 cal | |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 16.9 g | |
| Carbs | 10.6 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fat | 17.7 g | 12.7 g | |
| Fiber | 6.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PLANT-BASED GROUND | BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thiamin | 1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 4.8 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PLANT-BASED GROUND | BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 150 MG | 0 MG | |
| Copper, Cu | 0.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Phosphorus, P | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 531 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 336 MG | 585 MG |