PINEAPPLE TUNOVER vs APPLE SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PINEAPPLE TUNOVER wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
PINEAPPLE TUNOVER: 5
vs
APPLE SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PINEAPPLE TUNOVER | APPLE SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 409 cal | 67 cal | |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 1.1 g | |
| Carbs | 51.8 g | 15.6 g | |
| Fat | 18.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 1.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PINEAPPLE TUNOVER | APPLE SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PINEAPPLE TUNOVER | APPLE SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 19 MG | 222 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 77,647 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 325 MG | 0 MG |