PINEAPPLE HAM GLAZE vs COOKING RICE WINE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKING RICE WINE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
PINEAPPLE HAM GLAZE: 0
vs
COOKING RICE WINE: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PINEAPPLE HAM GLAZE | COOKING RICE WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 316 cal | 67 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 73.7 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PINEAPPLE HAM GLAZE | COOKING RICE WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PINEAPPLE HAM GLAZE | COOKING RICE WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 184 MG | 667 MG |