ORIGINAL HUMMUS vs CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL HUMMUS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL HUMMUS: 5
vs
CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL HUMMUS | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 20 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL HUMMUS | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL HUMMUS | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 267 MG | 767 MG |