ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES vs PORK RINDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES wins in 6 out of 15 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES: 6
vs
PORK RINDS: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 405 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 50 g | |
| Carbs | 78.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 10.8 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 8.1 MG | 2.9 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.9 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 0.9 UG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.0 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 27 MG | 0 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 0 UG | 30 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 459 MG | 1,857 MG |