ORIGINAL COOKED CORNED BEEF vs UNCURED MAPLE SMOKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL COOKED CORNED BEEF: 4
vs
UNCURED MAPLE SMOKED HAM: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL COOKED CORNED BEEF | UNCURED MAPLE SMOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 156 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 13.3 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 8.9 g | |
| Fat | 5.4 g | 4.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL COOKED CORNED BEEF | UNCURED MAPLE SMOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL COOKED CORNED BEEF | UNCURED MAPLE SMOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 2.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 389 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 893 MG | 556 MG |