MATZO - STYLE SQUARES vs LUNCHABLES HAM AND CHEDDAR CRACKER STACKERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNCHABLES HAM AND CHEDDAR CRACKER STACKERS wins in 8 out of 12 nutrient categories
MATZO - STYLE SQUARES: 1
vs
LUNCHABLES HAM AND CHEDDAR CRACKER STACKERS: 8
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MATZO - STYLE SQUARES | LUNCHABLES HAM AND CHEDDAR CRACKER STACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 450 cal | 283 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 13.2 g | |
| Carbs | 80 g | 24.5 g | |
| Fat | 13.3 g | 15.1 g | |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MATZO - STYLE SQUARES | LUNCHABLES HAM AND CHEDDAR CRACKER STACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MATZO - STYLE SQUARES | LUNCHABLES HAM AND CHEDDAR CRACKER STACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 189 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 415 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 433 MG | 925 MG |